(Non)fiction

In her
dissertation on truthfulness in memoirs, Caroline van de Pol argues that all
nonfiction includes at least some fictional elements, citing psychological
research on memory that revealed memory, in fact, does lie:
“[T]he
process of remembering is not a passive one and constantly evokes a
reinterpretation of the past in the present.”
Van de Pol also states that part of
the drive and motivation behind writing and reading includes mixing fact and
fiction. However, she believes it is the writer’s duty to tell the truth as
part of an unspoken “contract” with the reader. But van de Pol defines truth
differently than the conventional concept of it by arguing that facts are only
one small part of the whole truth; truth concerns itself more with “authenticity
and integrity.” Therefore, the author should aim to portray an “emotional truth” rather
than an objectively factual account.
Throughout the dissertation, van de
Pol refers to examples of memoirs and other nonfiction works and discusses her
own experience in writing in the genre to support her argument. Overall, her
argument is strong, not only because of these examples and references, but also
because she qualifies her thesis. She acknowledges the complexity of the concept
of a pure truth and does not suggest a black and white answer to the question
of whether memoirs contain truths or lies. Rather, she suggests it is somewhere
in between and, more importantly, that that is part of the art of writing,
even, and perhaps especially, in nonfiction.
“[T]he art of storytelling, the
construction of language, the blurring of fact and fiction and the role of the
reader are among the most prominent of the imperatives that drive us to write
and to read.”
- Caroline
van de Pol
Comments
Post a Comment